Calling Into Question



80% suicide victims?
93% Workplace Fatalities?
76% Homicide Victims?
61% Homeless People?

How can women be so cruel and unfeeling
not to see this? Are they like Emma
Watson- emotional cripples- using men as tax fodder?
Nearly half of all domestic violence too is
caused by women- see Erin Pinney on this- female Founder of the Domestic Violence Shelters, before feminists kicked her out of her own organization!
Feminism is propaganda - and ONLY propaganda. It is a gigantic hate crime against all men- even transgender and millenial 'feminist' men. Watch out they will prosecute, hound, persecute and eliminate you also if they could! Men are foolish goyim tax-fodder to pay for their own misery, depression and losses.

Women OWN over 65% of the Western worlds wealth; mainly through marriage and inheritance. Women outnumber men as adult voters at every age echelon or cohort. They outlive men by up to two or three more elections than men. (Men just 'front' for women in these cases). Democracy is womens government. Women voted for the 'workers-socialist' Adolf Hitler in great numbers- thus are majorly responsible for WWIi.  He considered himself 'married' to these voters, on a sacred secular and socialist mission; that is why he only officiated with Eva Braun just before the end; before his Condor flight to Spain from Templehof and arrival by submarine in South America. Saving Europe for the European Union- from the invading Six Million Soviet troops massing on his Eastern border. That is why defending Europe began in the East. Eastern Europeans are leaving the EU precisely because it is so much like what the Warsaw pact countries under Left Wing domination were like to them. So similar as to be exact. That is why it is logical to leave; 70% tax rates are too much leaving people in a subsistence condition and with expreme poverty unavailed by socialist taxes and ill-thought programmes. Socialism does not work; as this page shows on the tax fodder front.

It is not left or right that is the lefts problem; this is a 'black' herring! It is the tax fodder socialism that is the problem. Socialism always eradicates its enemies: Auschwitz- Six Million, Gulag- One Hundred Million. Left or Right: Socialism always pens you in. Fit for slaughter, like cattle. Tax farming. First they pen you in with the pen. Literally. I mean this. Then they pen you in with words. Next they pen you in with speech crimes and thought crime. Then they pen you in with ideology. Next they pen you in with politics and violence. Their violence plus their words equals you are guilty. See how they turn things around. They perjoratavise truth because they love lies. Then they pen you in with ideas from academia fashioned entirely with words. Words alone; they seek your harm with words. They are too lazy to create wealth. They want to steal yours. Socialists always work with words. Words are cheep. Deeds are costly. We are dying for want of deeds. The European Union as a History museum. It features only the left wing view of history with the formation of the European Union as the crown. Women crouch like lemmings on this epistomolgical structure without knowing its inherent clumsiness and fragility. A dangerous condition of vast ineptitude.

And now Feminism- as a type of 'female socialism'- is eliminating men. As this page shows. Along the economic front. By taxes. By your taxes!
This is an undeclared ideological war on men and the male gender. That is why they dislike President Trump so much. He is a man. Not perfect perhaps. Yet, plainly a male actor, in the theatre of international politics.

Women spend over 80% of the household budget in the West. Women capture most of the Pension spend throughout the West. Mainly because they live at those advanced years over eight years on average longer than men. Perehaps men should retire that longevity gap earlier than women? Say, at sixty, with women 'retiring' at nearly seventy? That would be fairer, yes.  Feminism moves this gap upwards since feminist ideology opposes reality. Many men do not even make it to retirement. Up to a third of all men suffer 'life damage' so severe that they will never be well or work again over the course of a fifty year working life. Losing millions in 'lifetime earnings' each. The insurance industry could not cope with the real recompences due/owed to men.  Nor can society fully payout the risks men run normally in such jobs as airline or helicopter pilot. We never think of these things. The male gender is the gender that never complains. Until now- mainly because you add heavy insults to your very real injuries to out political, intellectual and social value. Running interference does not constitute what men call a JOB. In America in the 1920s the longevity of men is just one year short of that of women. Showing how far more men overall today, suffer far more than women. Up to one thousand times more life-limiting suffering. It should be our number one issue. Not feminism.

10% colonial tax

In New Zealand pioneering independence a vigorous nation is born. Carved out of the bush by the hard work of men. Now an interesting idea occurs here. Ask yourself the question-How many people, roughly, worked for the Government in those days as police, militia, customs officials Judges and so on? Well with just 10% tax they could really afford only about ten percent of the people right? So a 'working concept' throughout this website is the assumption that the tax level approximately reflects the numbers of individuals proportionately dependent on Government wages, contracts, salaries, grants, funding, handouts and benefits.
By the time of Michael Joseph Savage one of the first of the Obama breed of socially concerned politicians. If one man is injured the donations of Forty seven men were collected in a welfare tax in order to help him recover and return to work. A ratio of around 1: 47 as a welfare tax. Around this time too John Maynard Keynes came up with his version of Socialist politics- that of 'stimulation' 'printing money' or quantative easing (which is its modern name). And the idea too of the multiplier. Money so created is donated into fake government jobs with low pay. You could dig a hole and fill it in as far as he is concerned. Some economist, Eh! The multiplier in Michael Joseph Savages time is around seven. (Some may note here its similarity to the Miracle of Banking number of the unlikelihood of paper holders returning to claim their gold). You are right it is the same trick in a different guise. For both are inflationary. As the surrounding society intuits the increased availability of money and raises prices. The Miracle of banking (thought devious by socialists and their shallow thinking) is exactly Keynes Multiplier in another dress- of which they approve.
 By back engineering then the multiplier of those days one can work out the real tax rates in round figures. The real tax rate in the days of Michael Joseph savage must have been near 30%. Income tax may have been lower than today but duties and costs of imported items is higher.
How did I do it? There is only 100% And the number of Government workers, pensioners and beneficiaries must have been around thirty percent of the whole population. As 7 remains in the 70% of the Hundred percent. The multiplier being a crude bulk figure- only approximate to about ten percent margin of error. Either way. So seventy percent of 'all actual potential transactions' in theory.
So what happens today when the real tax rate is 67%? Obviously from the above approximately two out of every three people are well paid or receive free income from the hard work and efforts of the non-governmental sector. That is a bit harsh and unfair on the , mainly men, who work outside in all weathers, outside of the government sector. It sounds like the mainly male sector- men being 'pushed' out of Government jobs- are paying through the nose as serfs or slaves for the public servant masters at the behest of all our unfair/unequal political parties. All of them appear happy with this horrifying disparity. While nominally you may receive the average $50,000NZ/US dollar per annum/year fully two thirds of it almost immediately returns to central/federal Government to pay for feminist and LGBQ initiatives and policy that is as likely to be hostile to your own best interest and very favourable to theirs. They are laughing at your foolishness- all the way to the bank. I think the phrase- 'throw the rascals out' is uttered for occassions exactly like this. So what is to be done- to paraphrase Lenin? Throw the rascals well and truly out- forever if possible.
Today the full real & total taxes of ONE man support the better paid Government Job of another (Usually a woman) and two or three poorer people as well on Government handouts and benefits. If you divide the tax economy into tax takers and nett tax makers. It is the serious intent of this writer to suggest that because of these vicious anomalies only NETT tax makers vote in order to save any fairness left in democracy. The tax burdens of the nett tax makers must be recognized. We are not here to indulge your twee ideology. We are here to actually make real advances not phony ones. Mens Liberation is entirely about discussing that option. Is there another way? If the above condition is true then current situations between men and women cannot possible survive without radical actions.
Interestingly the multiplier, the velocity of money circulation, inflation and the level of political disappointment is all linked here economically; surely this idea alone is worth $50,000? And an Honarary Phd? Anyone?

 

None of the Government boffins in the current sorry line up could work it out.

Oh, yes... of course....there are other sources of income; (Yeah right but they too disappear in party kickbacks- and only serve the upper levels of economics and big government projects; very little discernable trickle down)... we must consider how very like (when justified male wrath really gets going) political parties behave EXACTLY like criminal gangs- note how soft on gangs of the lower sort they are. Also how like secret societies they act. Loyalty, not to the nation, Country, Crown or USA or New Zealand ; but loyalty to the party alone. Not what is good for the people but what is good for the party. Thus they lack all integrity.

Tax rates and the REAL rates of tax.

BEING SCREWED OUT OF TWO THIRDS OF YOUR INCOME

Why would you work at all? # Number ONE TIP: Had enough maths? How personal economics works - here is my shorthand topNotch TIP.

At the 40% mark of the real tax rate whether Government employee or not- You are far better off if you become Conservative Politically than if you Vote Labour/Democrat or Socialist anything- virtually anywhere round the world. Then you privately can have the utter joy of helping people with your own money- because you know it costs you. Greatest discipline is greatest freedom- old Zen sage.  Spending other peoples money on abstract 'others' brings no joy- and some parties put this to evil uses. And you can never be sure which.
Below 40% real tax rate it could make some kind of sense - advantages of scale or some such thing- but still depends on handing your money for who-knows-what. That is why at 67% real taxes (income, GST- sales tax/VAT, property taxes, state taxes, compulsory accident Insurances, health insurance, employment insurance and other compulsory fees, charges, taxs, levies. imposts and so on) you are willingly taking part in a heavy thirty percent constant losing investment in deep poverty abiding in your country forever. All the really smart people will leave and you will never ever get them back.
That is why we have Venezuela & California as Basket cases today. The best thing for America to do is sell California to China. Unfortunately many Californians would agree wholeheartedly until they woke up next morning under Chinese administration. That would soon cure them of the California disease.
In all cases with no exceptions countries with low taxes boom and prosper. Countries with high taxes fade and die. The happy time is only at the beginning. As per Michael Joseph Savage because of low rate of the real (full & total rate of tax; in his day just 30%- so fairly safe option) rate of taxes created to pay for it.
Today at a claw back of 67% viciously destroying purchasing power any increase only speeds up the destruction of wages, production (modern Governments have so reconstructed definitions of 'production' one would have to be seriously mad to believe them) and increases the illusion- by heftily grasping such a large hunk of the tiller- that Governments 'control things'.  They don't. Despite Hegel and Marx. History rolls on with its own surprises.
Unless we unpack vast tracts of such fabulous 'control' we are doomed. Increasing handouts will actually reduce by far more the spending power. Especially at such high rates.
A NOTE: Remember I mentioned before about reverse engineering the multiplier- it probably affects the banks velocity of money too. And thus banks dip out big as well. Could be why Westpac repatriates so much profit straight away to Australia. It does not want to leave its cash a minute longer in a country run by madmen.
For at 67% real tax rate the miracle of banking figure reverts down to 3.3 with too many calls on its money to be healthy.
That is it Ladies and gentlemen- the Maurice Joseph! The ratio between the real tax rate and the multiplier: 2017- 3.3!
Colonial 10%-real tax rate/multiplier- 9/Miracle of Banking Return- 9 times
Interregnum 20% -real tax rate/multiplier- 8/Miracle of Banking Return-  8 times
Early Socialism (Michael Joseph Savage)  30% -real tax rate/multiplier-7 /Miracle of Banking Return- 7 times (base period)
Management & Control (Keynes) 40% -real tax rate/multiplier- 6/Miracle of Banking Return- 6 times
Postwar Economies 50% -real tax rate/multiplier- 5/Miracle of Banking Return- 5 Times
Modern Economies 60% -real tax rate/multiplier-4 /Miracle of Banking Return- 4 times
PostModern/End of History 67% --real tax rate/multiplier- 3.3/Miracle of Banking Return- 3.3 times (faster X 2)
 I would like to call these connections after my father Maurice Joseph O'Sullivan; Director of Treasury, Waikato Tax District- on this day 28/10/2017
 The Coefficient of Desire
 Moving along now with a name change; lets call the Real Rate of Tax 2RT or (2RT)
The Coefficient of Desire is a measure of the clarity of the market signal in terms of express desire. At zero- the very best government for economics the purity of the market signal is 100% perfect. The transactional choices of millions of free peoples (free peoples or free money; people who are free seldom harm one another; eg. Switzerland) Free money harms everyone as we shall see here. Money is accurately and exactly delivered to the area of the economy on the 'other side'of the transaction that is best according to the time and place and needs of these living willing participants- everyone gets busy-which is the healthiest lifestyle. No one is denied the joy of giving and great honour is given to those who humbly give. Not calling attention to themselves for political gain. They do not steal the money of others and pretend it is theirs to give.
At (2RT) of zero the Coefficient of Desire is 10 - meaning an exact match of 100%
At (2RT) of 10% the Coefficient of Desire is 9- only a ten percent blurring of CoD
 At (2RT) of 20% the Coefficient of Desire is 8- generousity is attractive and useful.
At (2RT) of 30% the Coefficient of Desire is 7- Savages legacy- the last useful level of socialism.
At (2RT) of 40% the Coefficient of Desire is 6- around here the switch occurs;results are inverted.
At (2RT) of 50% the Coefficient of Desire is 5- disappointment increases; inverse result of intent.
At (2RT) of 60% the Coefficient of Desire is 4- a full 60% confusion of desires & result
At (2RT) of 67% the Coefficient of Desire is also 3.3. Meaning that the taken money and what is left spins very fast indeed while stopping at fewer and fewer hands. Almost all decisions are made by people now NOT handling their own money so do not feel the hard earned weight of blood and sweat behind it. They spend carelessly on vaguely 'good' things whether people want it or not. Increasingly it is spent for ideological and electoral reasons- the signal is blurred by two thirds since no one at all is truly held accountable for it. In the real place of harvests and fast moving fashions people inform themselves smartly and with an eagle eye for detail and deft timeliness unmatched by any politician. A million decision makers who decide freely for free themselves is much more than a match for some slow witted and plodding political party hack who has to be paid massive amounts of boodle just to get off his fat arse and decide. He nearly always decides wrongly or too early or too late; too much or too little even if he is as he seldom is- on target, on time and on budget. If that is the case it is nearly always a loudly trumpeted fluke. Merely to look good come some new election time. In business you starve the non-profit making ventures and reward the profitable areas of your business; in politics you throw good money after miserable prospects in the belief they will vote for you.
Ever wondered where unwanted Christmas and birthday presents come from? They always come from unthinking socialist parties and Governments. Beyond the real rate of some 40% plus floating inflation the bite is so vicious that the only apparent winner seems to be the return in government receipts. That is only for a short while. Actual conditions call out for immediate cuts in fake government employment, and in business and other taxes. The government is now addicted to taxes like a drug whose good feeling straight away now evaporate. Logically the thing to do from 40% onward is to strike if you are a worker: hence the recent history of that actually happening whenever socialist parties gain power. They are brought down by their own comrades who expect more not realizing it is only to be obtained by precisely other devices than those announced by empty rhetoric and socialist propaganda. Many, so called 'right-wing' parties err in this regard too. Caught in the historical drug. For they cross the 40% line also rendering their conservative rhetoric null and void once the results of any high level of total applicable taxes reaches lower profit and incomes in wages and salaries. The 40% limit where advantages of socialism begin to cease is virtually an ironclad economic law.
There is only one way out- intense exploration of South Sea Oil resources. They who hold the rights, and the rights to effective access could conceivably cross this ironclad drug of addiction with near impunity. That is what any military or naval struggle in the future must be about. South Antartica Ocean Oil & Gas deposits measured in the thousands of trillions in dollar value (the first Zillion level of wealth in the world) make Zealandia and its associate basin the most hazardous likelihood theatre of conflict over the next twenty years; bar none.
A (2RT) of zero is where terror alone gets anything done. ( 100% real tax rates) No one will work for useless money. We are far too far along that path already.
I predict this Government on the last ever phase of 67% governance will show signs of its inabilty to govern before three weeks, will show the initial reasons for its ultimate collapse by six weeks and we must hope it is all ended by the time three to six months is up. One cannot minority govern in a 67% (2RT) environment with socialist policies. It is impossible. 28/10/17  "We Can Do This!" No, you cannot. It is totally impossible. You must reduce the public service and reduce taxes; that way, real people- but not the government, will experience a small but discernable lift in their spending power. Do the opposite and NEITHER the government NOR the people will experience anything except deep disappointment. By several months time I think. Rhetoric says 'free education' but what is barely deliverable is a mere one year of FEES being paid. A piddlingly tiny amount in anyones book. Seventy one thousand housing units needed; yet a mere 2 Billion funding package for just four thousand houses is announced!  Which is likely all they will build as rental units; not houses as home to raise families, but rentiers flats for party coffer cash flow. Enough to siphon off any amount in dummy jobs and wages. Featherbedding so well known to the unions. Truly pathetic mismatches of rhetoric with what is possible in such socialist druggie financial realities. What we really need are not rental apartments but relocatable demountable buildings for supervised hostels. Related highly to job placements and cheaper builds outside of cities. Empty the main cities by ten percent to relieve pressure and move beneficiaries south, east or west as need arises. To each according to their needs. People may immediately feel good on hearing otherwise  of such over-hyped socialist initiatives, but their real bank balances and their relocated cupboards will tell them another story. Of course the party in the old way feel great- but just for a short time. Macron was briefly once the most popular French president ever. Now he is the most disliked and distrusted of all time. Politics is a bitch.

 

Imagine being that American man in the 1920s full of life and energy full of love for his wife and family and he has a new car for the first time in his life. In fact during the roaring 20s for him and for many Americans in his situation up until the 50s he would quietly and steadily acquire his own home and a beach house as well and probably a boat or a caravan to aid him camping fishing trips. He could take his boys with him and his daughters also. He would have three or four children or maybe five or six and this was perfectly normal. There was so much fun belonged to a family in those days. All of it affordable on the wages from a single job at fairly regular rates occasional overtime. And the taxes are fairly low. How was that possible?

Today a young man may have three or four casualized jobs and a large student loan to boot acquiring interest and are slowly growing personal debt which may eventually drive him to suicide and he will probably never have a wife or a child of his own. Along the way some girl may accuse him of the bad speech crime or of making threatening hate speech or of intending rape her even. It is more likely a false accusation. Nevertheless the social welfare agencies will grant her a large sum of money feel obliged to press all her charges. His life will be ruined and he will go to jail. When he gets out things are no better and he kills himself.

How did these two scenarios both very likely for their age come about? Feminism and its toxic ideology is the only difference in the meantime. By acting as the reserve army of the unemployed the women helped to lower wages and salaries creating huge difficulties for the menfolk when seeking employment. By competing with the men they drove the wages and salaries down. The purchasing power of the first situation in the 20s 30s and 40s was probably four times higher than any chance of making that great today. She raised the children in tremendous and satisfied happiness. He went to work and earn enough money for a house a cabin in the bush or a beach batch a caravan boat for them to go sailing on the lakes and the harbours of America together with their own family. Feminism has completely destroyed the first scenario. Maybe women should never have been given the vote? It is an idea. It seems to me we would be far happier in our selves and in our family. Otherwise there is virtually no family, no house, no life, no money, no holidays away in your own little cabin at the beach. No cabin cruiser. Not much of anything really yet a colossal load debt and misery.

Would it not be better just to ditch feminism? Imagine a single policy or expensive project- compared to moving mens longevity up by seven whole years- that you have given full assent and approval to prior over the last five years. None? Welcome to the club. Men pay- but what we say; that is totally ignored.
Governments are not accountable to men at all anywhere. Mens issues abound everywhere on this site and others like it on the manosphere. Left wing? Tell me why little left wing man why none of the issues that affect men except gay men ever get funding? Specifically for men, like money earmarked totally for mens health. Seven year difference and no mens ministry? No equality for men in prison, out of prison- oh, I forgot with two out of three acting all around you like unpaid spies and informers- it is like living in East Germany under both the Nazis AND the communists. We are all living in this hellhole of a feminist prison. Including the Toadies who do not allow themselves to 'know' it.

Why support it by working at all; subsistence may be the far happier alternative. This is what we see in the MGTOW movement of individual and independent men. It is an urban solution. What then about a socially  wide-spread movement? It is to forestall that option that social welfare agencies everywhere are particularly brutal to men. Men receive far less under such 'helpful' regimes also because the mainly female overseers require long lasting clients in order to keep their plantation industry growing. They have no interest at all in empowering men generally for if the backlist reduced so would their jobs and employment opportunities as Government overseers. This  type of systemic contradiction is pointed out frequently by Ivan Illych in his books 'Deschooling Society' and others. Thus we can see readily Jacindas recent announcement of increases to the 'living wage' is, in reality a signal that hundreds of thousands of young women in fake government jobs- already taking income from men will receive more from her. Talk about paying people to vote for you. This pork barrel politics was once called stuffing the ballot box and is not a reward for ones contribution to society or to Aotearoa but is political payola. A move of the lowest kind. Despicable in anyone else. Shamefully short of the good grace of true Premiership or Statesmen come Ambassador; more like a plantation owner with their lackeys, lapdogs and overseers. I dread what the nastily 'empowered' young slutwalkers will do to official Government client-slaves who happen to be male.

 GENDER SLAVERY: Men on the Block

 When the People fear the Government We Have Tyranny; When the Government Fears the People We Have LIBERTY!

 Why have all our parties not said anything-that is the real issue; fake democracy- Totalitarian Democracy I call it.

 Government Competing with men as provider. Man as Lover. Man as Bringer Up of His Own Children.
Men fear Government. Women Love it- it Gives them the Choice of a Second Provider- even another Girlfriend With No reductions in their Benefit.

Big Government is not at all in the best Interests of Men. Big Government takes a mans money heavily interferes in all his relationships with women and brings extra fatal tension into all his relationships. Wnen does Government Support men. Not ever. Mens benefits... mostly Unemployment are the LOWEST of All.

Copy this page everyone- download all pages

CREATE FOLDER- 'Masculist'  Phillip O'Sullivan

Click select download ALL individual pages into it- copyright still mine- but now we are getting dangerous.

Police and Justice etc do observe all mens rights activist stuff so be very careful what you say and speak as if they are there; try to frame things so they can understand how wrong feminism and all its outcomes for all men are. Trust no women- there was once some woman on the mens rights site who seemed to be the mans girlfriend. She was always chipping in womens stuff. As if we could be bothered. Look Honey- we have had over fifty years of this. Parity on Google or in legitimate political objections is now only a few years away. We will be the mainstream fairly soon. Then WE SHALL PROSECUTE the MOST EGREGIOUS WOMEN; only then. By LAW- our laws certainly. For we shall become the greatest movement of MEN in HUMAN HISTORY. Stick with Us- we are the ones making our history of the Male Gender Consciousness.

 

 



EXPLAINING TRUMP & BREXIT

TAX FODDER

Phillip O'Sullivans New Book

 

OUT SOON!

 

 

 

    Tax Fodder
1st Edition Release Planned.
By December 10th
20,000 Words.
$2.99 US

Second Edition
January 30th 2018
30,000 Words
$3.99 US

Third Edition.
July 2018 Planned, with all references, updates and Resources given.

Plus illustrations & Diagrams, Tables and further examples.
With possible objections covered and exploration of
alternatives -to answer the impending austerity crisis. 

 

 

Taxes and feminism

Tax Feminism and Sparta: Cannon Fodder.

 Remember the movie, "The 300" they were soldiers from Sparta trained from boyhood to die state overseers and Plantation's were matrilineal inheriting women. It was a matrilineal society; a matriarchy run by females for the benefit of female is into the deadly demise of men.

Today our boys are not trained as soldiers to die they have pushed them quite the opposite way. Feminising them by keeping them far too long in the company of women and excluding men as much as possible from their lives so that they become super sensitive boy – girl millennial creatures of no fixed gender. Vapid and vacuous nothings of almost no use to anybody. Fit for the slaughter on the ideology of the state. Toyboy's as meat upon Judy Chicagos table. Empty live'd denizens of nowhere. Brain dead and dumbed down so that they are no obstruction in feminisms progress to absolute power. Which they believe is the source of captivating charisma. A sort of politics for cosmetic reasons. I look better in power than out of it. As if the real anointing of authority depend upon being at the head of a dazzling display of nothing.

 Men pay the money women spend them. The Top Ten Feminists in every category should worry about the ethics, fairness, balance and accuracy of things they have said, done and pronounced upon in the past. There will be some accounting to be done. Prosecutions must surely follow. Millions of male babies have died.
Thousands of Men sent into suicide. Boys molested by women, feminist taunts and abuse/abuses. There will be legal remedies taken. Confess now how you feel about it and much forgiveness can take place. Later will be too late. All men will be believed. No women. As is the reverse now. Justice department instruction and overseers guidelines.

Extortion and taxes

 


Lament of the Death Culture

 Compulsory Political Neutrality from All Our Public Servants.

You accept the Kings Coin/ CROWN office- you do what the King/CROWN says.

Like a soldier-go where the crown says- speak when the crown says- no offside political action strict neutrality public private life- or other solution no vote.

Incestuous Government- Labour Councils, Mayors and Labour Governments.

Clea sweep proof of long thought out conspiracy well funded and directed by the Chinese Government- as in Fiji?

True they are the only ones currently who want an Oblate Model access to Enlarged South Antartic Ocean Oil- Which is entirely what New zealand Politics today is about but with fairer open tender process. Americans included not secretly 'cut-out'- as in the Labour deal.

Labour is signing foreign Government deals for Campaign funding to Foreign Nations before actually becoming Government.

This is treason, public fraud and sedition. Betraying the New Zealand people behind their backs into preemptive relations.

We must investigate this further.

 

 The Two Economies.

 

 

Working for Families & Taxes

 

Perversion & Taxes

Pleasing everyone while  disappointing those who pay

Tax and control/management/power/sujugation/terror and force/right to rebel/ tyranny/suppression & Oppression.

A crime is committed- who benefits-follow the money

What to do Chatham Island Owenite Community Prison for main players

 Are antifa an attempt to derail the mens movement? If so people changing sides- people with a conscience are our friends. We appeal for you to come forward.

All the better if it costs you. You are OUR hero. They noticed your less than full fervour anyway- nothing will satisfy them. A great place amoung us will be your reward. We love all the women who join us.

Revolt of the Centre.

The International brigade are now the enemy?

Is New Zealand pulling in the drawbridge up into Jacinda Aherns safe place. Little Island New Zealand, land of the slave. A cannibal culture eatings its own? 600,000 human sacrifices rendered in meat. Greeting the stranger by grabbing his nose? So he does not smell the culture of death. The bitter sweet flavour of decease.

Taxes & people

Does free money ennoble people or empower them anyway? No, it makes them say a stinking yes to a pile of offal.

Tax Limits

 

 No one ever considers there may be tax limits to Government plans. One Hundred percent is an obvious one.

Slavery is like that; owner provides accomodation, food (of a kind) and miserable day long hard back breaking work. Irish people were so hated by the British plantation owners that they were enslaved as well. Having so little value that if you killed one by the lash there was no fine. Black slaves had some indirect 'protection' then. For if you killed one there was restitution to be paid to the British plantation owner. You could say 100% tax was extracted from their lives. They did receive a little 'benefice'- their food, -their accomodation-their employments; from their 'government'- the British Plantation owner and his 'public servants' the overseers.

Today men are the slaves of leftist-feminist Governments everywhere. Men do the hardest, most unfashionable, hottest, dirtiest and coldest and the more miserable work. Extracting much more than half their income from them. Leaving them in fact just the food money, clothing and mortgage or rent money. The governments leave you with just the third of salary or wages. Building housing exclusively so they can rent them out in the cities to government workers and overseers. Government has now become a Rentier. Like the Universities. They then make even more money from you but do not call it a tax. Thus we become actual tax slaves not rhetorical ones. Impoverishment of this kind suit socialist governments as it means you are tied all the more closely to the Nanny States apron strings. And will agree with whatever else they have up their sleeve. Like sell out Aotearoa to the Illuminazi hellhole world Government through the United Nations, the World Bank and other indentured slavery agencies and overseers. We are being tax farmed into the international criminal Bankers cartel whether we like it or not for access to South Seas Oil in the South Antartic Oceans. That is the real plan. On the cheap too. Man do they sellout cheap. Cowards hungry for power they neither deserve nor honestly won. Lick their boots when they shoot you.

Taxes and a binding Gov constitution

taxes and money-purchasing power and the need for the best & highest possible price for ones own strong currency- weak currency tends to ward the weimar state whose ultimate play is hitlereanism replayed. Soviet rouble inflation and population depredation

Taxes make one subjugated subjects/ democracy and taxes

 

History & Taxes

Government Control and its limits of Citizens

 

Tax Takers and tax makers/ te Taare Ao Take to tarry and take tax as anarchist theft/ property is theft/ profit is theft/ tax as theft. Theft as a poor mans profit.

What are excess taxes- taxes and freedom tax and dergulation tax and the right to vote- why bother the poor

Does the tail wag the dog? Secvurity and somnolence- the unfittingness of security blanket governments and peoples to withstand competition and foreign onslaughts.

Tax tyranny and the public services

WINZ gives more money to women on a per person basis than Men receive- men are therefore discriminated against- free confession of this= reprieve

Repreive but greivous occurrences you remain and name names for the inevitable 'revolution' or transformation.

Who who seeks transformation must herself be transformed- now takes on a different meaning on this website. Prepare a list of those who have discriminated openly or secretly against men. Bounty for free hunters.

Rewards for good spies. Greater rewards for the more masculist useful information. We seek whistleblowers and internal agents of the transformed transformation. WINZ insiders. Justrice department article archives. White papers- Internal Documents. Genuine material please.

Lincolns Tax

The real sources of wealth

Welcome to NZ Venuezuela!

How feminism and the greenies fail all tests of good government.

 

My Background and credentials for these views.

Phillip O'Sullivan on his father's side comes from a long line of Catholic priests in Ireland. On my mother's side there are university professors in the sciences mainly biology and they worked at the University of Canterbury agricultural Institute outside the town she was born called Wye in Kent England.
My father retired as head of the Treasury Department for the Waikato tax District.
In my own education I attained the classes in mathematical mechanics – that is a level of mathematics that is tree University physics type mathematics where you have multi variant answers to questions as an quadrilateral equations. And binomial theorems. Before going to art school.
I was an early reader in my team of scientific journals and non-fiction literature like books on probability and chance, histories of modern mathematics in cosmology like Jagit Singh and Wittgenstein, A. J. Ayer and other writers on mathematical logic. See my website on in the Minimalism.

Phillip O'Sullivan has worked in Government as a Qualified Railway Officer. As a Tertiary Level Teacher, as an adult education instructor, as an artist in an independent business and as solo father and househusband in the early days of feminism so I have seen all these issues from a number of disparate sides.
www.philliposullivan.co.nz
Philip has written several books on masculist politics and theory. Ending only recently what he called his 'writing apprenticeship of three later years' from 2014-2017. Currently 'taking a year off' from his novel, poetry and non-fiction projects. He never intended these two websites until the latest election.

Devoted to driving feminism from all public life as a negative force that could destroy us all; including feminists. Feminism ultimately- as is socialism- is neither any good for socialists or feminists. We have possibly entered the event horizon however in feminism leading to the socialist death spiral. This is my cry. Against that possibility.

What do you think?

Send us feedback!