Men Indoors


Men should have absolute half  the control of all the social 'spaces' in the home- and women given half the chores and tasks out in the yard.
After all she uses the pool in the summer right- when you are not even home. So it is entirely fair she clean it more times. That is equality too.

After all she has a sewing room- inside the house-it's not outside.
Same with the laundry, kitchen, lounge and so on- for which she choose all the decor, fittings, machines and other equipment to save her labour.

So maybe she, if she is asking you to do half of those maybe then, just maybe could be fairly asked to do all of half of the cleaning, maintaining, and building or repair work outside the home in the yard, sheds, and garage. Perhaps she should fix or pay to fix half the costs of all car repairs from her allowance or allocation for expenditure. kind of- 'fix the car honey! No more nail polish this month!' And she pays all of it she does.


Women's work in the home is on display; mens home type chores are not. The upshot is it is about time that changed. Women's lib laid much of womens work on the backs of men. As a result men have been dying younger and younger relative women. Mens liberation is about reversing that unfair and unequal result. After all the above is a no brainer to men.


Therefore the mens workshop-with suitable double glazed sound proofed windows- should be visible fully from the living or dining room just as the Kitchen often is. Then mens work will be seen as socially valid even if unpaid. This is especially true if the male head is unemployed for a time. His families esteem- not faked but very real would be essential for him to get back up there in the workplace just as womens work is on display and not banished out in the yard where it becomes invisible or at least deniable within the theoretical structures of a gender blind feminism. We hope.

Masculist Book recommendations

These are the books this whole site references for its authority
Everything stated here is backed up by one or other of books like these.
However I consider their 'interpretations' weak and their recommendations for ACTION- in the light of population, economic, political and massive government funding biases to be highly regretable at best. For instance their recommendations are small in scale or dismissively 'ironic' as if we were talking about some tiny 'bad joke' incident.
The ramifications as to the survival of Western Civilization is really what at stake- and thus the deeper ironies run in precisely the opposite direction; how will feminism survive if it successfully destroys the so called capitalist/patriarchy/deep state structures on which it so seriously depends?











What do you think?

Send us feedback!